آخرین اخبار درگیری‌های بین‌المللی – ۲۰ آذر ۱۴۰۳

تشدید توحش صهیونیست‌ها در غزه

به گزارش خبرگزاری مهر به نقل از الجزیره، رژیم صهیونیستی در ادامه نسل کشی فلسطینیان در غزه، بار دیگر مناطق مختلف این باریکه را آماج حملات هوایی و توپخانه ای خود قرار داد.

بر این اساس، در حمله جنگنده‌های رژیم صهیونیستی به منطقه صبرا در جنوب غزه ۴ غیرنظامی به شهادت رسیده و شماری دیگر مجروح شدند.

خبرگزاری فلسطینی وفا نیز اعلام کرد طی بمباران رفح دستکم ۳ فلسطینی به شهادت رسیده و شماری نیز زخمی شدند.

همچنین منابع محلی می‌گویند طی حملات هوایی رژیم صهیونیستی به ۲ مدرسه که محل اسکان پناهجویان فلسطینی بودند دستکم ۱۵ غیرنظامی به شهادت رسیده و ۳۰ تن دیگر مجروح شدند.

براساس اعلام وزارت بهداشت غزه، از زمان آغاز جنگ در این باریکه در اکتبر ۲۰۲۳ تاکنون، دستکم ۴۵ هزار و ۱۲۹ غیرنظامی به دست نظامیان رژیم صهیونیستی به شهادت رسیده، و بیش از ۱۰۷ هزار نفر مجروح شده‌اند. برآورد می‌شود بیش از ۱۰ هزار غیرنظامی اکنون زیرآوارها هستند و باید آنها را نیز در نهایت به شمار شهدای جنگ افزود.

Source:


سیاست تعطیلی ‌و قطع گاز و برق جواب نمی دهد

به گزارش خبرنگار مهر، آیت الله محمد باقر محمدی لائینی در خطبه‌های نماز جمعه با گرامی‌داشت میلاد با سعادت حضرت فاطمه زهرا (س) و روز مادر خواهان توجه به صله رحم و حمایت از نیازمندان شد و افزود: انشالله که نسل جوان قدر پدر و مادر را بدانند.

وی فرهنگ و سبک زندگی دینی را مادر انقلاب اسلامی بیان کرد و گفت: ما با فریاد الله اکبر در مساجد و حسینیه‌ها انقلاب خود را آغاز کردیم و اگر سبک زندگی دینی را از ما بگیرند یعنی انقلاب از ما گرفته شده است.

آیت الله لائینی تصریح کرد: اگر سبک زندگی و فرهنگ زندگی غربی در خانواده‌ها رسوخ پیدا کند و ایمان و اخلاقیات ورزش‌های دینی فراموش شود انقلاب اسلامی صدمه خواهد دید.

نماینده ولی فقیه استان مازندران با گرامیداشت روز حفاظت امنیت پرواز گفت: سپاهیان عزیز حدود ۵ دهه توانستند از این مسئولیت به خوبی برای آیند.

برخی مناطق جاده‌ای ناقص است

وی از تلاش‌های فعالان حوزه حمل و نقل تقدیر کرد و گفت: برخی مناطق جاده‌ای ناقص است و نیازمند اصلاح است و یک روکش ساده می‌تواند بسیار از نارضایتی‌ها را برطرف کند.

امام جمعه ساری اصلاح الگوی مصرف را مسئله مهمی دانست و گفت: نباید اسراف و تبذیر داشته باشیم و به همه مردم توصیه می‌کنم که به پویش رئیس جمهور مبنی بر کاهش دو درجه‌ای دما و مصرف انرژی بپیوندند زیرا در مجموع سبب صرفه‌جویی ده‌ها میلیون متر مکعب گاز می‌شود.

امام جمعه ساری تصریح کرد: قطع برق و گاز کار درستی نیست و تعطیل کردن کشور نیز کار خوبی نبوده در حالی که هر چهار روز تعطیل هوا آفتاب بوده است.

آیت الله لائینی گفت در شرایطی که ما از سرمایه‌گذاران داخلی و خارجی برای سرمایه‌گذاری دعوت می‌کنیم و قطع گاز و برق آنان را ناامید می‌کند و از سوی دیگر قطع دو هفته‌ای گاز صنایع آنان را سرد می‌کند در حالی که گاز صنایع از خانگی نیز مهم‌تر است.

وی با بیان اینکه سیاست تعطیل و قطع گاز، آب و برق درست نیست گفت باید سیاست تعطیل را کنار بگذاریم و تدبیر را جایگزین آن کنیم و می‌توان هوا را سالم کرد بدون آنکه کشور را تعطیل کنیم.

آدمکش‌ها و جانیان در سوریه

نماینده ولی فقیه استان مازندران با اشاره به مسائل سوریه گفت: همون آدم کش‌های سابق با ژست دیگری و با خیانت کشورهای اسلامی و مسلمانان و با پشتیبانی سنگین و تدارکات آمریکا و اسرائیل روی کار آمدند.

آیت الله لائینی گفت: بیش از ۵۰۰ نقطه از زیرساخت‌های سوریه ا بمباران‌های اسرائیل نابود شد و بیش از ۱۸۰ فروند هواپیمای جنگی سوریه نیز بمباران شد و چگونه نسبت به این جنایات اعتراض نمی‌شود.

نماینده ولی فقیه در استان مازندران به عنوان اینکه زمزمه تجزیه سوریه مطرح است، ادامه داد: روی مشت آهنین تروریست‌ها دستکش مخملی کشیده شده است.

امام جمعه ساری با اظهار اینکه دشمن می‌خواهد مقاومت را ضعیف و نابود کند, ادامه داد: نقشه اسرائیل تحقق خاورمیانه جدید و بزرگ است و آینده سوریه از آن مقاومت است و اسرائیل نابود می‌شود.

Source:


Israeli occupation of Syria proves Iran”s warnings were right

Araghchi made the remarks in an interview with an Egyptian TV channel during his visit to the country accompanying Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian to attend the D-8 summit in Cairo.

“The Zionist regime”s behavior in the Gaza war and the massacre of more than sixty thousand women, children, and civilians in Gaza and Lebanon, and the regime”s aggression against Syria and the destruction of the country”s defense, economic, and other civilian infrastructure, demonstrate the correctness of Iran”s warnings about the threat Israel poses to the entire region,” the top Iranian diplomat said.

Referring to the presence of Iranian military advisors in Syria in the fight against ISIL and other terrorist groups before the fall of the Bashar Assad government, Araghchi warned of the return of the threat of terrorism to Syria due to the collapse of institutions in that country, which would become a threat to all countries in the region.

The top Iranian diplomat said that Iran was in Syria not to support Assad”s rule over the country, but to support the people, national sovereignty, and territorial integrity of the country against Zionist regime”s threat and other terrorist threats.

“Iran shares the goal of fighting the Zionist regime and supporting the Palestinian people along with the different sides of the Resistance Front, while each of the resistance groups operates independently.

Araghchi continued to note that it was for the heavy blows that the Israeli regime received from the resistance that it had to accept the ceasefire with Lebanon.

KI/TSNM3222742

Source: Kamal Iranidoost


No escalation if Azerbaijan has no intentions to attack

Prime Minister Pashinyan made the remarks in an interview with Armenpress, the full text of which is as follows:

Armenpress: Mr. Prime Minister, in an interview with a Russian media outlet, the Azerbaijani President confirmed that 15 of the 17 articles of the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace treaty have been agreed upon, and one of the unresolved issues pertains to the non-deployment of third countries’ forces along the border, and the other to the withdrawal of lawsuits against each other in international courts. What is the stance of the Republic of Armenia in this regard?

Prime Minister Pashinyan: We continue to be constructively engaged in the discussions around the peace treaty with Azerbaijan, and we have conveyed proposals on the two outstanding articles of the peace treaty to Azerbaijan for more than a month now, and we haven’t yet had a response. We propose the article about the non-deployment of the forces of third countries to cover the delimitated parts of the Armenia-Azerbaijan border, and this is logical, because in those parts the risk of escalation is significantly decreasing if not minimizing. Therefore, after the complete delimitation, there won’t be the need for the presence of a third force in any part of the Armenia-Azerbaijan border, and the Republic of Armenia is proposing this logic. Regarding the withdrawal of lawsuits filed against each other, when a peace treaty is signed this is logical, thus, the idea is acceptable for us. There are two nuances here: one of them is that there must be an understandable prospect for bilaterally resolving the individual humanitarian issues currently under discussion in international courts, and secondly, it must be clear that after withdrawing the disputes in international platforms regarding other issues the sides shall not put forward the same issues in the bilateral relations agenda and make them a source of lasting escalations.

Armenpress: What do you mean?

Prime Minister Pashinyan: I mean that not only shall we abandon the resolution of disputes in international courts, but the disputes themselves. We are ready to take that path. At this phase we are searching for solutions also in terms of individual humanitarian matters.

Armenpress: In the same interview, the Azerbaijani President once again voiced the matter of the change of Armenian Constitution, once again claiming that it contains territorial demands against Azerbaijan.

Prime Minister Pashinyan: I’ve had several occasions to address that topic, and I find it necessary to emphasize that if this is a sincere concern expressed by Azerbaijan, all grounds exist to consider these concerns dispelled. Why? Because the allegations that the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia contains territorial demands against Azerbaijan are based on the argument that the preamble of our Constitution contains a general reference to the Declaration of Independence, which in turn mentions Nagorno-Karabakh. In its 26 September 2024 ruling, the Constitutional Court of Armenia recorded that the reference to the Declaration of Independence in the preamble of the Constitution relates exclusively to those articles of the declaration that have gained literal stipulation in the articles of the Constitution. There is neither direct nor indirect mention of Nagorno-Karabakh in any article of the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia. If we were to accept the content of the Constitution the way Azerbaijan interprets it, then a question would arise, why didn’t Karabakh participate in the 1995 Constitutional Referendum, why didn’t polling stations open there and why didn’t the people vote on the Constitution. The same can be said about the subsequent presidential and parliamentary elections in Armenia. Besides, if the Azerbaijani interpretation of the Armenian Constitution were to be accurate, then the recognition of our brothers and sisters from Karabakh as refugees by Armenia would have been impossible.

Armenpress: You had said that Armenia has concerns that the Constitution of Azerbaijan itself contains territorial demands against Armenia.

Prime Minister Pashinyan: Indeed, and this concern is based on the fact that the preamble of the Azerbaijani Constitution contains a reference to the Constitutional Act adopted by the Azerbaijani Parliament on 18 October 1991. In turn, the Constitutional Act refers to the Declaration of Independence of the First Republic of Azerbaijan adopted on 28 May 1918, which records that the First Republic of Azerbaijan includes Eastern and Southern Transcaucasia. In November 1919, the Republic of Azerbaijan presented to the Entente its administrative map, according to which, Azerbaijan included the entirety of the provinces of Syunik and Vayots Dzor of Armenia, as well as parts of the provinces of Ararat, Armavir, Gegharkunik, Tavush, Lori and Shirak of Armenia, some 60 percent of the territory of the Republic of Armenia. Thus, the Constitution of Azerbaijan contains territorial demands against the Republic of Armenia. But we are not raising an issue of changing the Constitution of Azerbaijan for two reasons, first of all such an issue would bring the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process into a deadlock, and secondly, the agreed-upon part of the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace treaty contains an article which stipulates that the parties cannot refer to their internal legislation to justify the failure of implementation of the peace treaty. Another article of the agreed-upon part of the peace treaty says that the parties recognize each other’s territorial integrity, do not have territorial demands against each other and are bound to not make such demands in the future.

Armenpress: You mean that the concerns about the Constitution must not be the reason for not signing the peace treaty, but that the signing of the peace treaty itself will dispel these concerns?

Prime Minister Pashinyan: Definitely. And if we approach the matter from the viewpoint of the legislation of the Republic of Armenia, by our laws the peace treaty must be ratified in the National Assembly after the signing. Before that, the government must submit the treaty to the Constitutional Court to verify its compliance with the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia. If the Constitutional Court decides that the text of the peace treaty does not comply with the Constitution, although such a development is less likely after the 26 September 2024 decision, it would turn out that Azerbaijan’s arguments in this matter were correct and Armenia would have to make a choice between some articles of the Constitution and the peace treaty. But if the Constitutional Court decided that the text of the peace treaty complies with the Constitution of Armenia, it will pass the ratification process in our parliament. And according to paragraph 3 of article 5 of the Armenian Constitution, in case of conflict between the norms of international treaties ratified by the Republic of Armenia and those of laws, the norms of international treaties shall apply. Thus, after ratification in parliament, the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace treaty will gain superior legal force against laws and other normative legal acts of Armenia, and the topic of territorial demands will be closed forever. The same would happen in Azerbaijan. Meaning, it is the signing of the peace treaty that will practically dispel the concerns of both Armenia and Azerbaijan, including in relation to the constitutions.

Armenpress: And what is Armenia”s stance over the idea to disband the OSCE Minsk Group?

Prime Minister Pashinyan: Constructive. We understand the stance that if there is no conflict what”s the meaning of the existence of a format dealing with the conflict resolution. But we also want to be convinced that Azerbaijan is approaching this issue in this same logic, and for instance, that its motive under developing the narrative of the so-called Western Azerbaijan isn”t about engaging in aggressive policy against the territory of the Republic of Armenia.

Armenpress: But Azerbaijan says that by doing so it is not making any territorial demands against Armenia, and that it is a matter of the refugees” right to return and is calling upon the government of Armenia to respond to this right.

Prime Minister Pashinyan: It is obvious that official Baku, with its narrative of the so-called Western Azerbaijan, wants to materialize its territorial demands against the Republic of Armenia, which, as I showed above, is recorded in Azerbaijan’s constitution. If that’s not the case, and if we are wrong in our perceptions, then by saying Western Azerbaijan one must understand the regions of Gazakh, Tovuz, Aghstafa, Gadabay, Dashkesan, Kelbajar, Lachin, Kubatlu and Zangelan of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Therefore, the return of the people there is the internal matter of Azerbaijan, and the government of Armenia has nothing to do or discuss here, besides the matters that it is already discussing with Azerbaijan. I mean the establishment of normal relations that would ensure, among others, the security of Azerbaijan’s western and Armenia’s eastern borders.

Armenpress: Azerbaijan is accusing Armenia of acquiring non-defensive weapons and says that Armenia will not withstand an arms race with it.

Prime Minister Pashinyan: Armenia is not engaged in an arms race with any country, we are acquiring armaments exclusively for defending Armenia’s borders and territorial integrity, meaning for defensive goals, and our goals are transparent. We are told that defensive weapons must be bought for defensive purposes. But it is impossible to organize defense only with defensive weapons. For instance, if Armenia were to have highly modern anti-air and electronic warfare measures, how would it defend itself in case of a land attack? Of course with artillery, of course with missiles, of course with other strike measures. Azerbaijan is also acquiring non-defensive weapons, does it mean that they are engaged in revanchist policy?

Armenpress: Azerbaijan is overall attempting to make the arms acquisition of Armenia a topic on the agenda.

Prime Minister Pashinyan: According to all international norms, the Republic of Armenia has the right to have armed forces and an obligation to protect its own citizens, including from possible foreign threats. The army reforms are our legitimate right. Is this a threat for Azerbaijan? No. Because we have clearly recognized and recognize the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Azerbaijan in the territory of the Soviet Azerbaijan and we expect that Azerbaijan, like us, without leaving room for misinterpretations, will recognize the territorial integrity of the Republic of Armenia, in accordance with our agreements, and will refrain from the policy of threats. Threatening statements are made from Azerbaijan to the Republic of Armenia practically every day. In such conditions our reaction even gets internal criticism, because we say that we don’t even have an objective to militarily return the over 200 square kilometers of our sovereign territory that is currently under occupation, because the institutional solutions reached in the delimitation issue enable us to resolve this issue in a peaceful, negotiated way. In this context we even offered Azerbaijan to create a bilateral mechanism of mutual arms control. But Azerbaijan hasn’t responded so far, while the difference of the military budgets of Armenia and Azerbaijan is threefold, in Azerbaijan’s favor. Accusing us of acquiring armaments in such conditions is not fair, to say the least.

Armenpress: And how would you assess the risk of renewed escalation in the region?

Prime Minister Pashinyan: I can guarantee that Armenia has no intention, goals or plans to attack or engage in any provocative actions against Azerbaijan, and that it will not take that path. If Azerbaijan also doesn’t have intentions to attack Armenia, then the likelihood of escalation in the region is zero.

Mr. Prime Minister, will the delimitation process go on? If yes, in which section?

Prime Minister Pashinyan: The regulations of the delimitation commissions are ratified in both Armenia and Azerbaijan, which means that the delimitation process must continue. I think the delimitation commissions will meet soon to discuss in which section the delimitation shall continue. We are ready for constructive work in this matter as well.

Armenpress: And what about the issue of regional connections. Azerbaijan continues to develop its narrative of a so-called corridor.

Prime Minister Pashinyan: We assess that we have found a solution on how to reopen railway connection for it to be fully acceptable for both Armenia and Azerbaijan. And we have conveyed the offer of this solution in a written form to Azerbaijan and we are waiting for their positive response. When this reaction happens, it will be necessary to swiftly sign an agreement and start the construction of the railway.

Republished from Armenpress website

Source:


US to announce final package of new weapons for Ukraine

The package includes air defense interceptors and artillery munitions, according to a third source, but the exact contents are expected when the package is announced in the coming days. The package will be worth about $1.2 billion, according to sources as cited by Reuters.

Under USAI, military equipment is procured from the defense industry or partners, rather than drawn from American stocks, meaning it can take months or years to arrive on the battlefield.

US President Joe Biden’s administration will announce in the coming days its final Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI) package, using the remaining funds set aside to buy new weapons for Ukraine, according to two sources familiar with the matter.

The package includes air defense interceptors and artillery munitions, according to a third source, but the exact contents are expected when the package is announced in the coming days. The package will be worth about $1.2 billion, say the sources.

Under USAI, military equipment is procured from the defense industry or partners, rather than drawn from American stocks, meaning it can take months or years to arrive on the battlefield.

The USAI package could be among the last steps the United States takes to provide direct military support to Ukraine as Kyiv braces for the return of President-elect Donald Trump, who has publicly questioned military aid and vowed to end the Ukraine war soon after taking office on January 20.

Since Russia’s attack on its neighbor in February 2022, the United States has committed $175 billion in aid for Ukraine, including approximately $61.4 billion in security assistance.

About half of that security assistance has come through the USAI program, and the rest has gone toward pulling from existing military stocks via presidential drawdown authority.

There is $5.6 billion remaining of presidential drawdown authority.

The State Department and Pentagon have declined to comment on the upcoming announcement, saying they do not discuss security assistance packages before they are officially revealed.

Source:


اماکن مذهبی در مصرف انرژی الگو باشند

به گزارش خبرنگار مهر، حجت‌الاسلام علی زاهددوست در خطبه‌های نماز جمعه خورموج اظهار کرد: احسان به والدین، از جایگاه ویژه ای نزد خداوند برخوردار است. در قرآن، پنج بار کلمه «وَصَّیْنَا» بکار رفته که سه بار آن مربوط به توصیه به احسان والدین است.

وی اضافه کرد: احسان به والدین، از حقوق انسانی است که هر پدر و مادری بر گردن فرزندشان دارند و مسلمان بودن آنان شرط نیست. باید در متون آموزشی ما از مهد کودک تا دانشگاه و در تولیدات هنری و رسانه‌ای در فیلم‌ها و سریال‌ها منزلت والدین و تکریم به پدر و مادر برجسته شود.

امام جمعه دشتی با تبریک ولادت حضرت فاطمه زهرا (س) و روز زن و روز تولد امام راحل (ره) افزود: باید قدردان زحمات بانوان محترم جامعه باشیم چرا که همه موفقیت‌های مردان و فرزندان خانواده مدیون مجاهدت زنان و مادران است.

وی ادامه داد: زنان افتخار کنند که روز ولادت حضرت فاطمه زهرا (س) روز آنهاست، و سعی کنند با تبعیت از آموزه‌های فاطمه اخلاق و رفتار و خصوصاً حجاب فاطمی را در خود به کمال برسانند.

زاهددوست افزود: شب یلدا طولانی‌ترین شب سال است، سنت دیرین ایرانی‌ها در شب یلدا یعنی رفتن به دیدن پدرها و مادرها و پدربزرگ‌ها و مادربزرگ‌ها و تدارک یک دورهمی صمیمانه بدون گناه پسندیده و مورد تأیید دین است.

وی با گرامیداشت یاد و خاطره شهدا والامقام کربلای ۴ اضافه کرد: شهرستان دشتی در این عملیات ۱۸ شهید تقدیم انقلاب و نظام اسلامی کرده که یاد این شهدا برای همیشه در تاریخ این شهرستان و کشور زنده و مایه افتخار خواهد ماند.

امام جمعه دشتی بیان کرد: دشتیاتی های غیرتمند در دفاع مقدس و جبهه‌های نبرد حق علیه باطل با تقدیم بهترین جوانان دین خود را به اسلام و انقلاب اسلامی ادا کرده اند.

وی با اشاره به ضرورت صرفه‌جویی در مصرف انرژی تصریح کرد: در اسلام زیاده روی در مصرف هر چیزی مذموم و حرام است و ما مسلمان و شیعه هستم نباید در آمارهای جهانی ما را کشور پرمصرف بشناسند.

زاهددوست ادامه داد: گاهی ممکن است با ۲ درجه کاهش دمای خانه یا خاموش کردن چند ساعت بخاری در آب و هوای مساعد ما مشکل کمبود گاز برای هموطنان مان در یک نقطه دیگر حل شود. مساجد و اماکن مذهبی باید در مصرف انرژی الگویی برای سایرین باشند.

وی ادامه داد: از اینکه یک کشور اسلامی در مسیر مقاومت بنام سوریه دچار هرج و مرج شده، جولانگاه گروه‌های مختلف تکفیری و صهیونی شده و ۹۰ زیرساخت‌های آن در همین چند روز توسط صهیونیست‌ها ناراحت هستیم.

زاهددوست بیان کرد: سناریوهای مختلفی برای آینده سوریه مطرح شده مانند اینکه گفته اند: ممکن است سوریه تجزیه شود و زیر نظر گروه‌های عربی صهیونی و ترکی بدون دولت مرکزی اداره شود. یا اینکه گفته اند ممکن است به کشور دیگری ملحق شود و کانون بحران منطقه شود. یا اینکه ممکن است به تدریج اوضاع آرام شود و دولت مرکزی سر کار بیاید. وی تاکید کرد: به هر حال جای نگرانی برای آینده سوریه وجود دارد اما آنچه مطمئن هستیم این است که جمهوری اسلامی در قبال فلسطین بهترین تصمیم را گرفته و حضورش در سوریه در راستای امنیت ملی خود و کمک به فلسطین بوده و ذره‌ای از آن پشیمان نیستیم و نسبت به آینده جبهه مقاومت کاملاً خوشبین هستیم.

Source:


اسرائیل از ضعیف شدن سوریه استفاده کرد

به گزارش خبرنگار مهر، حجت الاسلام جواد طاهری در خطبه‌های عبادی سیاسی جمعه این هفته شهر کاشمر که در سالن اجتماعات امام زاده سید حمزه برگزار شد، اظهار کرد: حملات داعش به سوریه آنها را ضعیف و بنیان‌های اقتصادی و زیرساخت‌ها و بدبینی قومیتی در این کشور ایجاد کرده بود.

امام جمعه کاشمر گفت: کشوری که ۳۷ گروه معترض و منتقد دارد خواه ناخواه اتحاد آنها از بین می‌رود و این گروه‌ها فرصت پیدا می‌کنند اعتراضاتشان را اعلام کنند.

وی تصریح کرد: دشمن به گروه‌های معترض سوریه پیام داده بود که با مردم هیچ کاری نداریم اما تا اوضاع به هم ریخت و رئیس جمهور فرار کرد، تمام زیرساخت‌های نظامی و تاسیساتی آنها تا تأسیسات آب شرب آنها توسط اسرائیل مورد هدف قرار گرفت.

طاهری افزود: وضعیت سوریه نشان دهنده کارهای اسرائیلی است که می‌گوید ما حامی مردم هستیم و برای کشور ایران نیز همین گونه می‌گوید که با دولت ایران مشکل دارد و با مردم ایران کاری ندارم؛ در صورتی که او شیطان مکار است و از رفتارهایش باید درس بگیریم و در سخت‌ترین شرایط و اوج مشکلات با هم متحد باشیم و به وعده‌های دشمن دل نبندیم چون وعده‌های دشمن برای فریب دادن است.

امام جمعه کاشمر عنوان کرد: دشمن هدفش گره گشایی از جوامع بشری نیست و آن هم اسرائیل نژاد پرستی که جز بردگی چیز دیگری از مردم جهان نمی‌پذیرد.

وی گفت: اسرائیل از ضعیف شدن سوریه استفاده کرد و نیروهایی که خودش پرورش داده و در قبل آنها را تروریست می‌دانست و هنوز می‌داند اسمش را عوض کرد به این کشور مسلط کرد حال وقتی می بیند که این گروه پرورش شده دست خودش است برای اینکه به اسرائیل تعرضی نکند تمامی زیر ساخت‌های نظامی سوریه را از بین برد.

Source: